Answer Library / Respirators & Air OSHA letter · 2020-04-03

Can employees reuse or extend use of N95 respirators, and can expired N95s be used?

Quick answer

During the COVID-19 N95 shortage, OSHA allowed the same worker to extend use or reuse a single N95 as long as it kept its structural and functional integrity and the filter material was not damaged, soiled, or contaminated, and allowed expired NIOSH-certified N95s under strict good-faith conditions (29 CFR 1910.134). Without those good-faith efforts, violations of 1910.134(d) would be cited as serious. This guidance is archived and no longer current policy.

In April 2020, N95 shortages hit every industry with respiratory hazards. OSHA's April 3, 2020 enforcement memo told compliance officers how to handle employers who reused N95s or dipped into expired stock during the crisis, across all industries.

For extended use or reuse, employers could let the same worker keep using a single N95 provided 'the respirator maintains its structural and functional integrity and the filter material is not physically damaged, soiled, or contaminated (e.g., with blood, oil, paint).' Workers had to perform user seal checks each time they donned the respirator, written respiratory protection programs had to address contamination circumstances, and storage procedures had to prevent degradation between uses.

For expired N95s, OSHA exercised enforcement discretion only when the employer showed good-faith efforts to obtain alternatives (elastomeric respirators, PAPRs, or other NIOSH-approved FFRs), monitored supplies and prioritized per CDC guidance, provided surgical masks and eye protection as interim measures, and implemented engineering and administrative controls. Only previously NIOSH-certified expired N95 FFRs could be used, and workers had to be told of their expired status. In healthcare, expired N95s could not be used during surgical procedures on COVID-19 patients or during aerosol-generating procedures such as CPR, intubation, extubation, bronchoscopy, nebulizer therapy, and sputum induction.

OSHA weighed enforcement discretion case-by-case only when all four conditions were met; absent those efforts, violations of 29 CFR 1910.134(d) would be cited as serious violations. This memo is archived, temporary pandemic guidance and is no longer current OSHA policy.

1910.1341910.134(d)
Source: OSHA Standard Interpretation letter, 2020-04-03 — read the official letter on osha.gov →
Interpretation letters explain how OSHA applies its rules to specific situations. Always verify current requirements — regulations and enforcement policies change.

Get answers like this in seconds — with the receipts

Canary AI answers safety & compliance questions from the actual standards and interpretation letters, cites the exact section, and drafts JHAs as clean PDFs. Free during the pilot.

Join the pilot →

Related answers

Can a physician perform spirometry under the OSHA silica standard without a NIOSH spirometry certificate?Respirators & Air · OSHA letter 2018-07-30Can OSHA cite an employer for chemical exposure when there is no PEL for the substance?Respirators & Air · OSHA letter 2018-11-02Are grit- and water-based sweeping compounds acceptable for silica dust housekeeping under OSHA?Respirators & Air · OSHA letter 2018-11-02