Answer Library / Recordkeeping OSHA letter · 2018-09-13

Is an injury OSHA recordable if the employee gets a brace or splint, even with the rigid stays removed?

Quick answer

Yes, in both cases. OSHA says orthopedic devices with rigid stays or other systems designed to immobilize parts of the body are medical treatment, and a splint will always be considered medical treatment (29 CFR 1904.7(b)(5)(ii)(F)). Removing the stays doesn't help — the healthcare professional's recommendation to immobilize the injury makes it recordable.

An employee hurts their wrist at work and, after evaluation by a licensed healthcare professional on-site, receives an over-the-counter brace/splint. The letter writer asked whether the case is recordable in two scenarios: with the rigid or semi-rigid stays removed from the device, or with the stays left in.

OSHA answered that both scenarios are recordable. Under 29 CFR 1904.7(a), employers must record work-related injuries and illnesses that result in medical treatment beyond first aid. The recordkeeping rule treats non-rigid means of support — elastic bandages, wraps, non-rigid back belts — as first aid, but orthopedic devices with rigid stays or other systems designed to immobilize parts of the body are medical treatment (29 CFR 1904.7(b)(5)(ii)(F)).

Two points of OSHA's reasoning are worth noting. First, OSHA does not recognize a 'semi-rigid' category, since orthopedic devices function to immobilize body parts. Second, OSHA stated flatly that a splint will always be considered medical treatment, even if the splint is fabricated to fit the injured employee.

Even in the removed-stays scenario, the case stays recordable because the licensed healthcare professional's original recommendation of a brace/splint to immobilize the injury established it as medical treatment rather than first aid. OSHA cited its January 19, 2001 final recordkeeping rule and a November 28, 2017 interpretation letter on similar orthopedic device questions.

29 CFR 1904.7(b)(5)(ii)(F)29 CFR 1904.7(a)
Source: OSHA Standard Interpretation letter, 2018-09-13 — read the official letter on osha.gov →
Interpretation letters explain how OSHA applies its rules to specific situations. Always verify current requirements — regulations and enforcement policies change.

Get answers like this in seconds — with the receipts

Canary AI answers safety & compliance questions from the actual standards and interpretation letters, cites the exact section, and drafts JHAs as clean PDFs. Free during the pilot.

Join the pilot →

Related answers

Is paraffin wax heat treatment considered first aid or medical treatment under OSHA recordkeeping?Recordkeeping · OSHA letter 2024-10-22Are ZipStitch or Clozex wound closure devices first aid or medical treatment under OSHA?Recordkeeping · OSHA letter 2019-10-09Is an EpiPen injection recordable under OSHA?Recordkeeping · OSHA letter 2018-09-13