Answer Library / Respirators & Air OSHA letter · 2020-04-03

Did OSHA allow respirators certified by other countries during the COVID-19 N95 shortage?

Quick answer

Yes, temporarily. In April 2020 OSHA permitted filtering facepiece respirators and elastomeric air-purifying respirators certified under standards of Australia, Brazil, China, the European Union, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Mexico, with employers required to prioritize NIOSH-certified equipment first (29 CFR 1910.134). This was archived, pandemic-era enforcement discretion, not a permanent rule change.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, N95 respirators were in critically short supply. On April 3, 2020, OSHA issued interim enforcement guidance to its compliance officers allowing temporary flexibility under the Respiratory Protection standard (29 CFR 1910.134) so employers could use respirators certified under foreign standards.

OSHA permitted use of filtering facepiece respirators and elastomeric air-purifying respirators certified by Australia, Brazil, China, the European Union, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Mexico. One critical limitation applied: devices certified exclusively under standards of the People's Republic of China, and not made by a NIOSH certificate holder, could not be used for aerosol-generating procedures in healthcare settings 'unless the only feasible alternative is a facemask or improvised nose/mouth cover.'

Employers had to prioritize equipment in a set sequence: NIOSH-certified equipment first, then foreign-certified devices, then facemasks, with homemade masks only as a last resort. Regardless of where a respirator was certified, all workers still had to perform user seal checks per 1910.134 Appendix B-1. OSHA exercised citation discretion only when employers demonstrated good-faith efforts to obtain appropriate alternatives and implemented engineering and administrative controls to reduce the need for respiratory protection. Note that this is an archived document reflecting historical pandemic guidance.

1910.1341910.134(f)(2)1910.134 Appendix B-1
Source: OSHA Standard Interpretation letter, 2020-04-03 — read the official letter on osha.gov →
Interpretation letters explain how OSHA applies its rules to specific situations. Always verify current requirements — regulations and enforcement policies change.

Get answers like this in seconds — with the receipts

Canary AI answers safety & compliance questions from the actual standards and interpretation letters, cites the exact section, and drafts JHAs as clean PDFs. Free during the pilot.

Join the pilot →

Related answers

Can a physician perform spirometry under the OSHA silica standard without a NIOSH spirometry certificate?Respirators & Air · OSHA letter 2018-07-30Can OSHA cite an employer for chemical exposure when there is no PEL for the substance?Respirators & Air · OSHA letter 2018-11-02Are grit- and water-based sweeping compounds acceptable for silica dust housekeeping under OSHA?Respirators & Air · OSHA letter 2018-11-02