Answer Library / Respirators & Air OSHA letter · 2020-10-02

Did OSHA waive fit testing for tight-fitting PAPRs during COVID-19?

Quick answer

Temporarily and narrowly, yes. OSHA's October 2, 2020 memo gave case-by-case enforcement discretion on fit-testing (29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2)) for NIOSH-approved tight-fitting PAPRs used by workers at high or very high risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure when fit testing was infeasible due to supply shortages. Everything else in the respiratory protection program, including medical evaluations, maintenance, and training, still had to be fully met, and this archived guidance does not have the force of law.

As fit-testing supplies ran short during COVID-19, OSHA issued temporary enforcement guidance on October 2, 2020 for tight-fitting powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) under the Respiratory Protection standard (29 CFR 1910.134 and 1910.134(f)(2)). The memo is archived historical content and explicitly states it 'does not have the force and effect of law.'

The scope was tight. The discretion applied only to NIOSH-approved tight-fitting PAPRs, only for workers with high or very high SARS-CoV-2 exposure risk, only where fit testing was infeasible due to supply shortages, and only as a contingency capacity strategy. It did not apply to PAPRs not approved by NIOSH, workers at low or medium exposure risk, protection against non-COVID hazards, or loose-fitting hooded PAPRs (which do not require fit testing in the first place).

To qualify, employers had to provide NIOSH-approved tight-fitting PAPRs with a high efficiency (HE) particulate cartridge to protect against SARS-CoV-2, monitor fit-testing supplies and make good-faith procurement efforts, implement feasible engineering, work practice, and administrative controls, and maintain full respiratory protection program compliance except fit-testing, including medical evaluations, battery and filter maintenance, and required training. Employees also had to 'maintain neatly trimmed facial hair that does not compromise the seal of the respirator,' with accommodation notes for religious exercise. OSHA warned that citations could still issue under the respiratory protection provisions if employers failed on medical evaluation, maintenance, care, or training requirements beyond fit testing.

1910.1341910.134(f)(2)
Source: OSHA Standard Interpretation letter, 2020-10-02 — read the official letter on osha.gov →
Interpretation letters explain how OSHA applies its rules to specific situations. Always verify current requirements — regulations and enforcement policies change.

Get answers like this in seconds — with the receipts

Canary AI answers safety & compliance questions from the actual standards and interpretation letters, cites the exact section, and drafts JHAs as clean PDFs. Free during the pilot.

Join the pilot →

Related answers

Can a physician perform spirometry under the OSHA silica standard without a NIOSH spirometry certificate?Respirators & Air · OSHA letter 2018-07-30Can OSHA cite an employer for chemical exposure when there is no PEL for the substance?Respirators & Air · OSHA letter 2018-11-02Are grit- and water-based sweeping compounds acceptable for silica dust housekeeping under OSHA?Respirators & Air · OSHA letter 2018-11-02