A question asked in every warehouse in America, usually about twenty minutes after an incident. The answer is no — and the reason it's worth a page is that the standard's actual answer is better than the joke.
When a forklift does something wrong, one of two parties is responsible, and OSHA has a prescription for each. If the cause was the human: 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(ii) requires refresher training whenever an operator has been observed operating unsafely, has been involved in an accident or near-miss, has received an evaluation revealing unsafe operation, has been assigned a different type of truck, or when a workplace condition changes in a manner that could affect safe operation — followed by an evaluation (1910.178(l)(4)(iii) requires one at least every three years regardless). If the cause was the machine: 29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1) requires any truck found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe to be taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition.
Notice the design philosophy: the standard doesn't do blame — it does correction. 'Discipline' in the OSHA universe means retrain the person, repair the machine, and document both. Progressive discipline of employees is an HR system, not an OSHA requirement — and OSHA has actually warned (in its October 2018 memo on safety incentive programs and post-incident drug testing) that policies used to penalize employees for reporting injuries can violate the anti-retaliation provision at 29 CFR 1904.35(b)(1)(iv).
So the real checklist after the forklift 'misbehaves': refresher training and re-evaluation for the operator (1910.178(l)(4)), out-of-service tag for the truck if it's defective (1910.178(p)(1)), and a hard look at whether the aisle, the load, or the schedule set them both up to fail. The forklift, being an inanimate object, remains beyond the reach of the law.